Лабров объясняет уверенность команды G2 перед чемпионатом мира.

Лабров, представитель G2, считает, что его команда может конкурировать с лидерами. LCK и LPL opponents. He also considers G2 and Karmine Corp the strongest current teams in Europe. His confidence comes from recent international results and changes to G2’s practice methods.

Labrov explained that Perkz has changed the team’s approach to training. The coach encourages players to discuss decisions and test direct ideas during practice. G2 now wants that work to produce a more consistent World Championship performance.

G2 sees Karmine Corp as its main European rival

Labrov expects G2 and Karmine Corp to remain close during the European season. He believes both teams currently operate above the rest of the league. That view does not mean he considers other opponents unable to win.

The rivalry carries extra value because both line-ups expect to reach the final stages. Regular matches provide information before a possible playoff meeting. Labrov said he already expects another important series against Karmine Corp.

International wins support his confidence

G2 has beaten several leading Asian teams during major events this year. Those results include victories against opponents from both Korea and China. Labrov uses that evidence when comparing G2 with the strongest international line-ups.

A single win does not remove the need for consistency across a tournament. G2 has also suffered clear defeats during the same season. Labrov’s claim rests on the team’s highest level rather than every match played.

Perkz changed the practice routine

Labrov said G2 previously focused on the wrong details during some practice games. The team could complete many sessions without learning enough from its mistakes. Perkz pushed the group to treat each training decision more seriously.

Players now discuss why a plan worked instead of judging only the final result.

That approach helps separate a good idea from a fortunate outcome. It also gives the coaching staff clearer information before official matches.

Direct calls can succeed or fail

Perkz often gives immediate instructions during practice instead of waiting for a long discussion. Labrov recalled one call that sent the entire team toward the bottom lane. The move failed and G2 lost the following fight.

Labrov used the example to show that experimentation includes visible mistakes. The value comes from understanding the decision after the game. A failed attempt can still reveal how opponents react and where coordination breaks.

Labrov wants belief without empty promises

The support player said his World Championship confidence is genuine. He does not want to describe international success as an impossible target. G2 has already produced results that justify entering those matches with belief.

That belief still requires preparation and accurate review. European teams have often struggled to repeat domestic form at Worlds. Labrov considers improved practice the route toward avoiding another uneven international run.

Consistency remains the unresolved challenge

G2 can defeat strong opponents and then lose heavily in another series. That contrast explains why outside expectations continue changing after each event. Labrov accepts that the team needs a steadier level.

Practice changes are intended to reduce those large swings between performances. Clearer communication can prevent five players from following different ideas. The process also makes it easier to identify one mistake before it affects the next game.

The interview describes a team still developing

Labrov’s comments combine confidence with specific examples from daily training. G2 has not claimed that practice changes guarantee a trophy.

The team is trying to make its strongest level appear more often.

Karmine Corp remains the immediate European comparison, while Worlds provides the larger test. Perkz has changed how G2 reviews and discusses practice. Labrov now expects that work to support another serious international challenge.

Results and practice now need to support each other

G2’s international victories give Labrov a factual reason for confidence. The team has already beaten leading Korean and Chinese opponents this season. Those wins show a level that exists even when it does not appear every week. The defeats matter for the same reason because they expose the difference between potential and consistency. G2 has lost heavily after producing stronger matches. Labrov does not deny that uneven record. Perkz’s practice changes focus on the decisions behind each result. A successful scrim can still include poor choices hidden by mechanical skill. A lost scrim can include a useful plan that failed through execution.

Discussing that difference helps players carry lessons into official drafts. It also reduces the habit of repeating an action only because it worked once. G2 wants a clearer reason behind every coordinated movement. Karmine Corp provides the immediate European test before Worlds. Labrov expects another close series if both teams reach the same playoff stage. That rivalry gives G2 high-pressure practice inside its own region. Worlds will finally measure whether the new process creates steadier performances. Confidence alone cannot complete a tournament run. Labrov believes improved training can connect G2’s best results across more consecutive matches.